Avalon logo
  • Legal
  • Cyber
  • Docs
    • Avalon Docs Home
    • Business Process Outsourcing
    • Managed Office Services
    • Managed Secure Print & Mail
    • Managed Document Scanning
    • Meeting, Presentation & Training Materials
    • Secure Print & Mail
    • Marketing & Branding Materials
    • Printing & Copying
    • Document Imaging & Scanning
    • Large Format Printing
  • Plans
    • Avalon Plans Home
    • Bid Management/Online Planroom
    • Large Document Production
    • Managed Office Services
    • Meeting, Presentation & Training Materials
    • Document Imaging & Scanning
    • Large Format Printing
    • Printing & Copying
  • Our Team
  • About Us
    • History & Mission
    • Leadership
    • Avalon In the News
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • Infographics
    • Videos
    • Slicks & Brochures
  • Planroom
  • Send us a File
  • Careers
  • Contact Us / Locations
Avalon logo

Employee Emails Used for Business Purposes are Off-Limits (in this case at least)

Posted on July 22, 2016 by Marketing Admin

woman working at home computerAn employer doesn’t provide his employees with email accounts, so they use their own personal accounts for business purposes.  So, when employer becomes involved in a business-related lawsuit, can the opposing party obtain pertinent information from those personal employee email accounts?

You’re probably thinking yes, of course, since the emails have to do with the business, right?  Not so fast, says the United States District Court, Northern District of California in Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF, 2015 WL 8482256 (N.D. Cal Dec. 10, 2015).

“Employer” in the above fact pattern is the plaintiff in Matthew Enterprise, Inc., which, generally speaking, operates as a car dealership buying and reselling cars from Chrysler.  The gist of the lawsuit is that defendant (Chrysler) made incentives available to competing car dealerships that it did not make available to plaintiff’s dealership which, in turn, resulted in competitors – and ultimately customers – paying lower prices for vehicles.

During discovery, Chrysler made a motion to compel various responses to its demands, including production of relevant business emails from the plaintiff’s employees’ personal email accounts.  In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff argued that it was not obligated to produce those emails as it did not have “possession, custody, or control” of those email accounts, rendering them outside of the scope of party discovery.

The Court, therefore, undertook an analysis of what it means for a party to have control over this type of data.  “‘Control is defined as the legal right to obtain documents upon demand.’”  Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF at p. 7.  Notably, “control” does not focus on the party’s ability to obtain the documents.  Citing a number of other decisions, the Court went on to note that “[d]ocuments are not discoverable under Rule 34 if the entity that holds them (here, the employees) “could legally – and without breaching any contract – continue to refuse to turn over such documents.”  Id.

Although Chrysler argued that plaintiff had instructed its employees through its handbook to “keep ‘internal information’,” the Court noted that plaintiff did not have a legal right to reclaim any of this information if it was in its employees’ personal accounts.

Take note, employers and lawyers alike.  Under this line of decisions, without “control” of emails contained in personal accounts – business-related or not – the employer cannot be obligated to produce those emails in a lawsuit.

If you liked this blog you might also be interested in reading: What Big ESI You Have!


Learn how Avalon used computer forensics to catch the bad guy.



Internal Investigation Case Study




Posted in Legal TechnologiesTagged access to personal employee email accounts, breach of contract, business-related lawsuit, discoverable documents, employee's personal email accounts, Matthew Enterprise Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, motion to compel, pertinent information from personal employee email accounts, production of relevant business emails, Rule 34 discoverable documents

Get news and helpful tips sent straight to your inbox

Sign me up!

Follow Team Avalon

Recent Posts

  • 6 Factors to Consider When Deciding Between Digital and Offset Printing
    September 20, 2018
  • The Power of Digital Print
    September 11, 2017
  • 8 Things to Consider Before Going Paperless
    July 19, 2017
  • How Do I Know If I’ve Been Hacked?
    June 21, 2017
  • Prevent Overspending on Copiers, Avoid These 4 Common Mistakes
    March 20, 2017

Tags

Avalon Buffalo Avalon Cleveland banner printing banners Bid distribution Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association CMBA computer assisted review construction bid management construction signs cyber security data breach digital printing document review drawing printing E-discovery ediscovery ediscovery education electronically stored information electronic discovery electronic evidence email threading ESI facilities management Flyers holiday cards identity theft kCura legal technology specialist litigation litigation support metadata outsourcing bid management predictive coding printer printing Relativity review platform signage sign printer sign printing signs spec printing trade show displays trial boards
Get news and tips sent to your inbox
Sign me up!
Follow Team Avalon
linkedin logo facebook logo
Syracuse: 315.471.3333Rochester: 585.242.9999Buffalo: 716.995.7777Cleveland: 216.592.9999Tampa: 813.221.3266Michigan: 248.955.9200Omaha: 402.885.8800Phoenix: 602.975.4001

©2025 Avalon Document Services. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookie Policy